Divorce Lawyers Indianapolis

 Where the court merely withdrew its finding of transmutation and affirmed award of money as being based upon wife’s share of marital property accumulated during marriage and as fair reimbursement of the wife’s share of marital contributions, this was an abuse of discretion, in the subdivision (c)(2) unequivocally required that reimbursement for marital contributions must be traceable by clear and convincing evidence.  In re Harmon
 Where petitioner’s award was approximately 25% of the estate, under the specific circumstances of the case, the court’s disposition was an abuse of discretion.  In re Hobbs
 The court abuse its discretion in failing to award all of the marital property.  In re Hobbs
 The trial court abused its discretion in dividing the marital property as if obligations from daughters represented bona fide accounts receivable with values established with equal certainty to other marital assets.  In re Smith