http://www.divorce-lawyers-indianapolis.com/blog Indianapolis Divorce Lawyers and Attorneys Fri, 19 Mar 2010 20:26:46 +0000 http://backend.userland.com/rss092 en 2-Hour Personal Financial Management Instructional Course  1 After Filing http://www.divorce-lawyers-indianapolis.com/blog/?p=18 Satisfy Your Credit Counseling Requirement Before Filing Bankruptcy 1 Before Filing http://www.divorce-lawyers-indianapolis.com/blog/?p=17 The trial court’s classification of various accounts as the wife’s non-marital property was against the manifest weight of the evidence since balance statements provided the trial court with a recent balance for each of the accounts but clearly failed to satisfy the tracing requirement of affirmatively identifying the source of ... http://www.divorce-lawyers-indianapolis.com/blog/?p=16  A trial court abused its discretion in granting injunctive relief where that relief did not preserve the status quo of the parties for purposes of equitable distribution of property.  In re Schwartz  A mandatory injunction was not necessary to preserve the status quo in terms of the condition of the apartment ... http://www.divorce-lawyers-indianapolis.com/blog/?p=15  Where the marriage lasted only six years and petitioner presented evidence in the form of receipts for at least some of the improvements she claimed were made, the trial court must determine based on the evidence already presented whether those contributions to the marital estate made to respondent’s non-marital residence ... http://www.divorce-lawyers-indianapolis.com/blog/?p=14  Where the court merely withdrew its finding of transmutation and affirmed award of money as being based upon wife’s share of marital property accumulated during marriage and as fair reimbursement of the wife’s share of marital contributions, this was an abuse of discretion, in the subdivision (c)(2) unequivocally required that ... http://www.divorce-lawyers-indianapolis.com/blog/?p=13  Neither party accused the other of dissipation, but the trial court sua sponte found dissipation by the husband in maintaining his separate residence, thus the husband was never given the opportunity to present “clear and specific” evidence that his expenditures for the residence were legitimate, and the trial court abused ... http://www.divorce-lawyers-indianapolis.com/blog/?p=12  Trial court’s dual classification of a 59 acre tract of farm land and the marital home as 4/7 non-marital and 3/7 marital was erroneous because property may not have dual characteristics.  In re Benefield  By finding a business to be non-marital but inventory of the business to be marital property, a ... http://www.divorce-lawyers-indianapolis.com/blog/?p=11  Absence of notice to the representative of the minor child in a custody proceeding did not affect the appellate court’s jurisdiction to consider the appeal, although the better proceeding did not affect the appellate court’s jurisdiction to consider the appeal, although the better procedure here would have been to have ... http://www.divorce-lawyers-indianapolis.com/blog/?p=10 In General  This Act does not mandate a recital of the specified factors in the judgment order or require written findings in any other form.  Allen v. Allen Considered  Trial court’s temporary order was not contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence that touched on various factors, including those listed in this ... http://www.divorce-lawyers-indianapolis.com/blog/?p=9